OUR METHOD

Four stages. Nothing rolls forward automatically.

Every stage ends with something in your hands and a decision that is yours to make. Most clients start at one and climb as the evidence accumulates.

Talk to us

The iAlpha protocol. Four stages, four decisions.

Each stage stands on its own. You invest in one, you get what it produces, and then you decide whether the next is worth it. We bill after we deliver, phase by phase.

The four stages of an iAlpha engagement, with the duration, deliverable, client input and decision at each.
	01 /Fluency	02 /Triage	03 /Pilots	04 /Production
Engagement	1 to 4 wks	3 to 4 wks	4 to 6 wks	6 to 8 wks
You receive	People who can judge a use case, and a written list of candidate agents	A ranked, costed shortlist with a named owner per line	Measured benefit and real run cost, pilot by pilot	A runbook, monitoring, and two trained owners
You supply	An executive sponsor who can settle scope	One process owner per candidate workflow	Access to real data, under your governance boundary	Two people named to own the system

Each duration is the working window for that stage on its own. They are not a schedule, and nothing commits you to running them back to back.

40% of agent projects die. Not one reason is technical.

Gartner puts the cancellation rate above 40% by the end of 2027, and the three causes behind it are all the same kind of thing: a decision made too early, or a decision never made at all. The four stages exist to force each one at the point where it is still cheap.

ESCALATING COST

The scope was never bounded, so the pilot kept growing to cover the next exception.

Every pilot is narrow, with its success criteria and its stop rule written before any code.

UNCLEAR VALUE

The use case was never ranked against the alternatives. Nobody could say what it was worth.

Triage ranks the whole opportunity set on value, feasibility and time to impact, before anything is built.

INADEQUATE CONTROLS

Governance arrived after the build. Usually after an incident.

The rules are written at Triage, before there is anything to govern, and enforced in production.

Gartner, 25 June 2025.

01 / FLUENCY

Your team learns to judge AI before you buy any.

Typically, tools get bought, training gets skipped, and usage stays shallow. The workshop fixes the order. We teach a method, everyone configures their own tools in the room, and nobody leaves without completing real work from their own role.

Then your people tell us which agents they want for the processes they own, and that is the list Triage starts from.

Fluency comes first for a reason. An agent handed to a team that cannot read its output is switched off inside a quarter.

When the workshop ends, the line stays open. An email address, for anyone at your company, for the questions that only surface once someone tries this on real work.

150+: professionals trained across our AI workshops
40+: agents designed by the people who would own them

How the workshops run

02 / TRIAGE

Every idea gets ranked before any of them gets built.

Triage takes the opportunity set function by function and ranks it on value, feasibility and time to first impact. You receive a costed shortlist with a named owner on every line: the ones we recommend you build first, and the ones we recommend you do not.

Most AI work that fails was built correctly and chosen badly. Triage catches that, at a fraction of the build it prevents.

The governance rules are written here too, before there is anything to govern: data boundaries, tool tiering, disclosure, and where a human has to review.

Nothing reaches a pilot without a ranked line, a named owner and a set of outcomes to build against.

1 MAP

Every repeated decision, document flow and handoff, function by function.
2 SCORE

Value at stake, feasibility with today’s models, and time to first impact.
3 CUT

Anything that fails the data test goes.
4 COST

Build effort, run cost, and the human time actually freed.
5 RANK

A ranked shortlist, an owner per line, and the pilots to build first.

03 / PILOTS

You see the real numbers before you commit to anything.

Triage does not pick one pilot. It picks the set worth building, and they run together. Running several at once is what makes the arithmetic honest. You find out which workflows earn their cost and which do not.

Each is a narrow workflow with its own success criteria and its own stop rule, both set before any code. We build by rapid prototyping: working versions in front of your users within days, then cut, keep or rebuild on the evidence.

They run against your real historical data, including the awkward records. A pilot built on a clean sample passes every test and then fails at the first real one.

We have built agents of this kind against real client data: research, finance, sales and customer intelligence.

See what we have built

WHAT THE PILOTS SETTLE

Measured benefit, not projected
Run cost at real volume
Where the human decides
Which survive real records
Which go to production

04 / PRODUCTION

The ones that earned it go live, and then they are yours.

The pilots worth keeping get hardened for real traffic: monitoring, logging, rollback and escalation paths. That engineering is done by our partner Delivery Devs, to a specification we write and sign off. Access, retention and audit are written down before the agent touches a production system.

Handover is a runbook and two trained owners inside your team. If we are still required in year two, the transfer failed.

This is its own stage and not the last week of a pilot, because exceptions are where most agents fail.

Ownership transfers with it: the code, the prompts, the configurations and the documentation.

What ownership covers

WHERE AGENTS ACTUALLY BREAK

The exception nobody documented
An upstream system that changes its output
The owner who left
The reviewer who stopped reviewing

Smarter, better, faster. Or we don’t build it.

One test is applied before we agree to build anything at all.

SMARTER

Everything relevant, in view

An agent reads every record, filing and prior case before it answers. A person reads what the day allowed.

BETTER

The same standard, every time

No drift between the first case and the thousandth. Exceptions escalated instead of guessed.

FASTER

Minutes, and never a queue

Work measured in minutes instead of days, running whether or not anyone is at a desk.

If a workflow does not come out smarter, better or faster, we don’t build an agent for it.

Triage is designed to reach that answer cheaply. A considered no is a good outcome, and it ends the engagement at the stage you paid for.

Four things we need from you.

None of them is a large commitment, and the work stalls without every one.

One executive sponsor

Someone who can settle scope inside a week, named in the engagement letter.

Where a question cannot be resolved, we stop the clock rather than build around it.

One process owner per workflow

A few hours each, from the person who actually does the work.

Where that time is not available, the workflow leaves the shortlist.

Real data, early

Under whatever boundary your governance sets, from the start rather than at review.

A pilot built on a curated sample passes every test, then fails at the first awkward record. It is the most expensive way to find a data problem.

Two named owners

Named at the start, to own the system after transfer.

If they change, the transfer is re-scoped rather than assumed.

Start with Fluency. It builds the judgement your people need, and it is the cheapest way to find out whether the rest of this is worth doing at all.

One of the founders reads your message. Not a coordinator. You’ll hear back within two working days.

We bill after we deliver, phase by phase.
A considered no at any gate is a good outcome.
We work globally, from the United States and Pakistan.

Or reach us however is easiest: